🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," stated one MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain individuals to follow this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states globally are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.